Gamification Effects on Motivation Quality and Self-Regulated Learning in EFL Vocabulary Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63228/4w269y31Keywords:
Gamification, self-determination theory, autonomous motivation, EFL vocabulary, self-regulated learningAbstract
Gamification has become a ubiquitous feature of digital vocabulary learning tools, yet evidence regarding its effects remains contested. Meta-analyses report modest positive effects on learning outcomes, but these averages obscure substantial heterogeneity in individual responses. Self-determination theory (SDT) distinguishes autonomous motivation (learning driven by interest and value) from controlled motivation (learning driven by external pressures or guilt). Gamification elements such as points, badges, and leaderboards may support basic psychological needs or undermine them, depending on implementation. This quasi-experimental study investigated (a) whether a gamified vocabulary app produced differential effects on autonomous versus controlled motivation compared with a non-gamified version matched for content, (b) whether observed differences in vocabulary learning outcomes were mediated by changes in motivation quality, and (c) whether self-regulated learning (SRL) behaviors were differentially affected by the intervention. A 10-week quasi-experiment assigned 127 Chinese EFL undergraduates to either a gamified condition (points, badges, levels, progress bars) or a non-gamified condition (content-identical, feature-matched, no game elements). Pre- and post-intervention measures included autonomous and controlled motivation for vocabulary learning (Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire), SRL strategy use (Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire), and vocabulary knowledge (receptive and productive tests). ANCOVA and mediation analyses were conducted. No main effect of condition on vocabulary gains emerged. However, the gamified group showed significantly higher controlled motivation at post-test (d = 0.52) and lower autonomous motivation (d = –0.38). Motivation quality fully mediated the gamification–vocabulary relationship: the gamified app indirectly harmed learning outcomes through increased controlled motivation, while the non-gamified app supported autonomous motivation. SRL strategy use declined in both groups, but gamification accelerated this decline for goal-setting and planning behaviors. Points and badges are not inherently motivating or demotivating. Their effects depend critically on whether they support autonomy or impose controlling pressures. EFL practitioners should exercise caution when implementing gamified vocabulary tools without attention to instructional framing that supports learners’ perceived autonomy and competence. Design principles for autonomy-supportive gamification are proposed.
Downloads
References
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2025). The role of language games in enhancing vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 25(1), 1–22.
Chen, L., & Zhang, W. (2025). Gamification bolsters self regulated learning, learning performance and reduces strategy decline in flipped classrooms: A longitudinal quasi experiment. Computers & Education, 198, 104789.
Dayag, J. D. (2025). Fostering vocabulary enhancement through Quizizz: A perspective on digital gamification. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 4(1), Article 3.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). ACM.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Kanat Maymon, Y. (2021). It is autonomous, not controlled motivation that counts: Linear and curvilinear relations of autonomous and controlled motivation to school grades. Learning and Instruction, 73, 101433.
Liang, Y. (2025). Evidence without hype: Gamified quizzing in EFL and ESL classrooms in low input contexts, a critical review and minimum reporting standards. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1568.
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525–534.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380.
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77–112.
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(3), 263–280.
Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2021). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal promotion in physical education and sport: A self determination theory perspective. In G. C. Roberts & D. C. Treasure (Eds.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (3rd ed., pp. 117–150). Human Kinetics.
Wang, C. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2021). Self determination theory and metacognitive knowledge in mathematics: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754370.
Xu, Q. (2025). Mobile assisted vocabulary learning [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University].
Yousaf, F., Akram, T., Syeda, S., Khan, R., & Naqvi, S. M. (2025). The effect of gamified mobile applications on vocabulary retention in secondary school EFL learners: A quasi experimental study in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 9(3), 1–15.
Zatserkovnyi, O. (2025). A comparative analysis of gamification tools in enhancing content retention in CLIL based EFL classrooms. Pedagogical Sciences, 28(1), 6–13.
Zhang, Y. (2022). Understanding Chinese EFL learners’ acceptance of gamified vocabulary learning apps: An integration of self determination theory and technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 14(18), 11288.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
