Learner Autonomy in the Age of AI: How GenAI Tools Reshape Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in EFL Academic Writing

Authors

  • Jati Suryanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63228/e8ynyd90

Keywords:

Learner autonomy, self-regulated learning, generative AI, EFL academic writing, writing strategies, metacognition

Abstract

The rapid uptake of generative AI tools in higher education has prompted urgent questions about learner autonomy and self-regulated learning (SRL) in EFL academic writing contexts. This study investigates how access to GenAI tools reshapes the self-regulated learning strategies of undergraduate EFL writers at a public Islamic university in Indonesia, with particular attention to goal-setting, monitoring, resource management, and help-seeking behaviours. Using a longitudinal qualitative design with sixteen participants followed across one academic year, the study draws on learning journals, stimulated recall interviews, and writing process traces to map how SRL strategies shifted as participants integrated GenAI tools into their academic writing practice. Findings reveal four patterns of SRL reorganisation: strategic augmentation, in which GenAI was incorporated as one resource among many within a developed self-regulatory repertoire; passive substitution, in which GenAI progressively replaced rather than supplemented self-regulatory effort; anxious avoidance, in which learners with high writing anxiety selectively used GenAI to manage affective load at the cost of developing independent strategies; and critical appropriation, a rare but instructive pattern in which learners developed metacognitive awareness of how their own SRL was being shaped by tool access and actively worked to counterbalance AI dependency. The study draws on Zimmerman's SRL framework (Zimmerman, 2000; Zimmerman & Moylan, 2009) and Benson's (2011) conceptualisation of learner autonomy to argue that GenAI access does not uniformly promote or undermine learner autonomy in EFL academic writing—its effects depend substantially on the self-regulatory capacities learners bring to the interaction and the pedagogical scaffolding their programmes provide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker, A. (2023). Student-perceived effects of generative AI on academic writing: Implications for EFL instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1102–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3217

Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching learner autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

Bhatt, I., de Roock, R., & Adams, J. (2022). Situating digital literacy practices: An academic literacies perspective. Literacy, 56(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12252

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. University of Michigan Press.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002

Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Wind, S. A., & Gao, T. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00014

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Elaldi, Ş. (2022). Foreign language anxiety and EFL learner profiles: An exploration of anxiety sources and coping strategies. TESOL International Journal, 17(2), 44–68.

Ferris, D. R. (2022). Treatment of error in second language student writing (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.

Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T. (2017). Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. Routledge.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Karyuatry, L., Rizqan, M. D., & Darayani, N. A. (2023). ChatGPT as a writing assistant for EFL learners: A preliminary study. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2023.5.2.10

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The "academic literacies" model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11

Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2025). Patchwriting, identity, and epistemic authority in Chinese EFL writers' source-based texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 63, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101118

Merkel, W. (2020). Plagiarism as ongoing uncertainty: A longitudinal study of novice writers' source use practices. Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.619

Muluk, S., Habiburrahim, H., & Akmal, S. (2021). Academic integrity among Indonesian EFL students: Awareness, attitude, and experience. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19394

Musthafa, B. (2021). The Indonesian schooling context and academic writing preparation. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3), 88–109.

Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. (2013). Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528

Nikolaidis, A. (2023). Epistemic authority in higher education: Student voice, institutional power, and the right to academic knowledge. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(4), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2148371

Ortega, L. (2020). The study of heritage language development from a bilingualism and social justice perspective. Language Learning, 70(S1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12347

Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9

Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Pratama, H. (2025). Student perceptions of plagiarism in Indonesian university writing courses: A qualitative inquiry. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.67823

Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Thorne, S. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2020). "Bridging activities," new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.25.3.558-572

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.

Yan, D. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on student motivation in EFL and ESL academic writing: An online survey study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(33), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00194-5

Zembylas, M. (2025). Epistemic emotions, academic writing, and the affective politics of higher education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2281341

Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2022). Foreign language anxiety in Chinese EFL classrooms: A review of empirical research. System, 107, 102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102779

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Learner Autonomy in the Age of AI: How GenAI Tools Reshape Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in EFL Academic Writing. (2026). Journal of Innovation in English Education and Language Teaching, 2(2), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.63228/e8ynyd90

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.