Between Scepticism and Adoption: A Phenomenological Study of Indonesian EFL Teachers' Lived Experiences Integrating Generative AI into Writing Instruction

Authors

  • Muhammad Nasheh Ulwan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63228/5s7c1f08

Keywords:

Generative AI, EFL writing instruction, teacher experience, interpretive phenomenological analysis, professional development, teacher identity

Abstract

While survey research has mapped the contours of EFL teacher attitudes towards generative AI, the lived, day-to-day experience of teachers who are actively attempting to integrate these tools into writing instruction remains underexplored. This study uses interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine how nine Indonesian EFL lecturers experienced the process of integrating generative AI tools into their academic writing courses over one academic semester. Data were collected through three rounds of in-depth interviews and reflective teaching journals kept throughout the integration period. Findings reveal a phenomenological landscape characterised by productive tension: teachers navigated ongoing oscillation between intellectual curiosity and pedagogical anxiety, between the sense of professional obligation to engage with new tools and the felt inadequacy of their preparation to do so responsibly, and between their desire to help students use AI well and their uncertainty about what using AI well actually looks like in a writing classroom. Four experiential themes organise the findings: the vertigo of not knowing enough, the loneliness of navigating without a map, the satisfaction of unexpected pedagogical discovery, and the moral weight of institutional silence. The study draws on Merleau-Ponty's (1962) phenomenology of embodied experience and van Manen's (2016) hermeneutic phenomenology to argue that teacher AI integration is not primarily a knowledge problem or a skills problem but an experiential one and that addressing it requires professional support structures that attend to the phenomenological dimensions of teachers' encounters with AI in their specific professional contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, M., & Picard, M. (2020). Plagiarism policies in Indonesian higher education: A critical analysis. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09351-4

Bamberg, M. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309355852

Becker, A. (2023). Student-perceived effects of generative AI on academic writing: Implications for EFL instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1102–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3217

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2022). Navigating language politics: A story of escape and return. Multilingual Matters.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dai, W., Lin, J., Jin, F., Li, T., Tsai, Y., Wind, S. A., & Gao, T. (2023). Can large language models provide feedback to students? A case study on ChatGPT. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT58122.2023.00014

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Elaldi, Ş. (2022). Foreign language anxiety and EFL learner profiles: An exploration of anxiety sources and coping strategies. TESOL International Journal, 17(2), 44–68.

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T. (2017). Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. Routledge.

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The "academic literacies" model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11

Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2025). Patchwriting, identity, and epistemic authority in Chinese EFL writers' source-based texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 63, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101118

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge.

Merkel, W. (2020). Plagiarism as ongoing uncertainty: A longitudinal study of novice writers' source use practices. Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.619

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Muluk, S., Habiburrahim, H., & Akmal, S. (2021). Academic integrity among Indonesian EFL students: Awareness, attitude, and experience. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19394

Musthafa, B. (2021). The Indonesian schooling context and academic writing preparation. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3), 88–109.

Ng, D. T. K. (2021). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Computers & Education, 191, 104525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104525

Nikolaidis, A. (2023). Epistemic authority in higher education: Student voice, institutional power, and the right to academic knowledge. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(4), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2148371

Norton, B. (2020). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.

Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9

Pennycook, A. (2022). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Pratama, H. (2025). Student perceptions of plagiarism in Indonesian university writing courses: A qualitative inquiry. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.67823

Prestridge, S. (2022). Categorising teachers' use of social media for their professional learning: A self-generating professional learning paradigm. Computers & Education, 129, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.003

Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Southworth, J., Migliaccio, N., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127

van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Winstone, N. E., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.

Yan, D. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on student motivation in EFL and ESL academic writing: An online survey study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(33), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00194-5

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zembylas, M. (2025). Epistemic emotions, academic writing, and the affective politics of higher education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2281341

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Between Scepticism and Adoption: A Phenomenological Study of Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Lived Experiences Integrating Generative AI into Writing Instruction. (2026). Journal of Innovation in English Education and Language Teaching, 2(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.63228/5s7c1f08

Similar Articles

1-10 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.