Gamified Vocabulary Learning in Vocational EFL Contexts: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study of Motivation, Anxiety, and Lexical Gains
Keywords:
Gamification, vocabulary learning, foreign language anxiety, Self-Determination TheoryAbstract
Gamification has attracted sustained interest in EFL pedagogy as a strategy for increasing learner engagement and reducing the affective barriers that often accompany vocabulary learning. Yet most studies have examined gamified vocabulary instruction in general secondary or university settings, leaving vocational EFL contexts where learners typically have specific occupational language goals, constrained instructional time, and varied prior exposure to English underrepresented in the research. This study investigates the effects of gamified vocabulary learning on motivation, foreign language anxiety, and lexical gains among vocational high school students in Aceh, Indonesia, over fourteen weeks. Using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, the study combines pre- and post-test vocabulary measures, Foreign Language Anxiety Scale scores, and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory ratings with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. Findings indicate significant gains in vocabulary breadth and retention for the gamified group compared to a control group receiving conventional instruction, alongside reductions in anxiety and increases in intrinsic motivation. Qualitative data complicate this broadly positive picture, however, revealing that gamification's motivational effects were uneven: competitive elements energised high-achieving students while quietly increasing the anxiety of lower-confidence learners. The study draws on Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000; Ryan & Deci, 2020) and Complexity Theory perspectives on language learning (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008) to argue that effective gamified vocabulary instruction in vocational EFL contexts requires careful attention to how competition, collaboration, and learner identity intersect in the specific cultural and institutional conditions of each classroom.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Coxhead, A. (2020). Vocabulary and English for specific purposes research: Perspectives and applications. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Demir, B., & Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2022). The effect of gamification on EFL learners' vocabulary learning and motivation. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.23
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2021). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proceedings of MindTrek, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Elaldi, Ş. (2022). Foreign language anxiety and EFL learner profiles: An exploration of anxiety sources and coping strategies. TESOL International Journal, 17(2), 44–68.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2020). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Kapp, K. M. (2021). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
Lam, Y. W. (2021). Gamified vocabulary learning: A review of design principles and empirical outcomes. System, 98, 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Musthafa, B. (2021). The Indonesian schooling context and academic writing preparation. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3), 88–109.
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Putri, N. A., & Maarof, N. (2021). Foreign language anxiety and EFL achievement: A study of Indonesian university students. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 234–248. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18196
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2022). Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An expansion of the UTAUT model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
Ryan, R. M. (2009). Self-determination theory and well-being. WeD Research Review.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sunardi, Suwandi, S., Saddhono, K., & Setiawan, B. (2020). EFL teaching and learning in Indonesian vocational high schools: Context, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal of Language Education, 4(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10971
Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729
Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2022). Foreign language anxiety in Chinese EFL classrooms: A review of empirical research. System, 107, 102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102779
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2022). Treatment of error in second language student writing (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
Flowerdew, J., & Costley, T. (2017). Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice. Routledge.
Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2025). Patchwriting, identity, and epistemic authority in Chinese EFL writers' source-based texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 63, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101118
Merkel, W. (2020). Plagiarism as ongoing uncertainty: A longitudinal study of novice writers' source use practices. Journal of Academic Writing, 10(1), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v10i1.619
Ortega, L. (2020). The study of heritage language development from a bilingualism and social justice perspective. Language Learning, 70(S1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12347
Becker, A. (2023). Student-perceived effects of generative AI on academic writing: Implications for EFL instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1102–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3217
Pratama, H. (2025). Student perceptions of plagiarism in Indonesian university writing courses: A qualitative inquiry. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i3.67823
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Turki Alsolami (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








